Document Type
Article
Abstract
The article outlines the construct of the ACA’s premium assistance tax credits, explores the legal controversies surrounding these subsidies, uses the tax subsidies cases to demonstrate the flaws in the Chevron framework, and argues that the Supreme Court should have framed its King v. Burwell analysis in a way that would have cured, rather than ignored, the ails of Chevron.
Recommended Citation
Vanessa L. Johnson, Marisa Finley & J. James Rohack,
King v. Burwell: The Supreme Court's Missed Opportunity to Cure What Ails Chevron,
42
J. Legis.
1
(2016).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/jleg/vol42/iss1/2
Included in
Health Law and Policy Commons, Legislation Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons