Abstract
This Article examines recent state and international practice regarding amnesties for jus cogens crimes, particularly cases from Latin America as well as international courts and tribunals, and explores the transnational legal dialogue between courts, and to a lesser degree, legislatures, that has led to international norm creation in this area, strengthening the prohibition against amnesties considerably. At the same time, constraints upon the exercise of universal jurisdiction, whether imposed by legislatures, articulated in judicial opinions, or created by international treaty, have provided a political check to the otherwise unbounded exercise of universal jurisdiction by states and the exercise of universal international jurisdiction by the international community taken as a whole. Indeed, this Article suggests that the question of amnesties for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide raises profound questions about the nature and form of international criminal law—its substantive content, temporal dimensions, and constitutional status. This Article challenges the conventional wisdom that “swapping justice for peace,” is morally and practically acceptable. Instead, what longitudinal studies we have suggest that amnesty deals typically foster a culture of impunity in which violence becomes the norm, rather than the exception. This Article considers amnesties from a jurisdictional approach, in which domestic, transnational and international amnesties are considered in both horizontal and vertical perspective. Finally, while noting that international criminal justice is not a “one size fits all” proposition, and that carefully tailored and culturally sensitive approaches suitable to individual cases are required, this Article underscores the importance of the emerging normative and legal structure apparent in international criminal law, as well as the need for imperial powers such as the United States to submit themselves to the rule of law in order to enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness of the rules. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
Recommended Citation
Leila N. Sadat,
Exile, Amnesty and International Law,
81
Notre Dame L. Rev.
955
(2006).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol81/iss3/5