California Propositions 62 & 66 as Misguided Models for the Capital Punishment Debate: The Argument for the Inclusion of Catholic Social Teaching and Other Religious Denominations in the Discussion and a Proposed Solution

Authors

Cornelius V. Loughery

Document Type

Note

Recommended Citation

Cornelius V. Loughery, California Propositions 62 & 66 as Misguided Models for the Capital Punishment Debate: The Argument for the Inclusion of Catholic Social Teaching and Other Religious Denominations in the Discussion and a Proposed Solution, 43 J. Legis. 264 (2016).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/jleg/vol43/iss2/5