Abstract
Responding to these views requires some reflection on the nature of voting and parenting both. At root, Stephanopoulos and Fishkin don’t think parents are the right people to represent their children politically, and we do. We unpack these theoretical differences as to both voting and parenting in Part I. In Part II, we address Stephanopoulos’s and Fishkin’s concrete policy proposals.
A last note: While our response below naturally focuses on points of disagreement, as that is the way of these things, that focus shouldn’t detract from the crucial fact that all four of us—from different political perspectives—think the status quo tilts politics in ways that hurt children and should be changed. The discussion below also shouldn’t detract from our gratitude to these two extraordinary scholars for giving us the benefit of their serious engagement.
Recommended Citation
Joshua Kleinfeld & Stephen E. Sachs,
What Is Voting For?,
100
Notre Dame L. Rev.
1327
(2025).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol100/iss3/8