The Standard for Measuring the Validity of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure: The Shady Grove Debate between Justices Scalia and Stevens

Authors

Allan Ides

Abstract

The article offers information on the new challenges which were added in the Erie Doctrine when alternative interpretations were provided by the judges of U.S. Supreme Court. It discusses the standard and general description of the Erie Doctrine and views of supreme Court justice named Antonin Scalia. It also informs about the issues which do not follow the new interpretations given by the judges.

Recommended Citation

Allan Ides, The Standard for Measuring the Validity of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure: The Shady Grove Debate between Justices Scalia and Stevens, 86 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1041 (2011).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol86/iss3/3