Evan J. Criddle


The article discusses the growing friction between international human rights and humanitarian law in counterinsurgency by developing a relational theory. It illustrates how the relational approach to choice-of-law analysis could lay a foundation for counterinsurgency regulation under international law by giving examples of conflicts in Afghanistan, Argentina, and Israel. It informs that the population-centric vision of counterinsurgency had been experimented by the U.S. in Afghanistan.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.