Abstract
The article focuses on a new strategy to "anti-aggregation agreements," contractual provisions which prohibit parties to participate in class action. It discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, suggesting that such agreements should be based on actual regulatory compliance. It mentions that anti-aggregation agreements are applied by default, but in case there will be an irreversible harm occurring to party, such agreements will not be applicable.
Recommended Citation
David L. Noll,
Rethinking Anti-Aggregation Doctrine,
88
Notre Dame L. Rev.
649
(2012).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol88/iss2/3
COinS