Abstract
This Note urges restoration of the proper balance of power between judges and juries regarding expert evidence. Our justice system has steadily moved away from letting juries decide important questions of fact and toward putting the decisionmaking power into the hands of judges. The recent developments in evidence law, requiring judges to act as the “gatekeepers” of expert evidence, present significant obstacles for plaintiffs attempting to get cases to a jury. This newer standard in expert evidence is a violation of the foundational precept in American jurisprudence that the people should be the sovereign, not the judge.
Recommended Citation
Krista M. Pikus,
We the People: Juries, Not Judges, Should be the Gatekeepers of Expert Evidence,
90
Notre Dame L. Rev.
453
(2014).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol90/iss1/11