Abstract
This essay makes two main points. First, the majority’s interpretation of the CWC Act is inconsistent with the statute and the underlying treaty. Indeed, the majority opinion displays a basic misunderstanding of the design of the underlying treaty. Second, Justice Scalia’s construction of the Necessary and Proper Clause is antithetical to the structure and original understanding of the Constitution. If adopted as law, Justice Scalia’s view would seriously harm the federal government’s ability to conduct foreign affairs on behalf of the nation. Since Justice Scalia’s constitutional error would be far more damaging than the majority’s statutory error, the majority’s statutory misinterpretation is the lesser of two evils.
Recommended Citation
David Sloss,
Bond v. United States: Choosing the Lesser of Two Evils,
90
Notre Dame L. Rev.
1583
(2015).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol90/iss4/7