Abstract
By comparing how preemption and First Amendment law have used purposive approaches to limit the right of publicity, we can see something about how boundary work in intellectual property law (IP) is done—badly, usually, with justifications that aren’t consistent or that assume that other regimes work differently than they actually do. One improvement would be to embrace categorical approaches, rather than unpredictable case-by-case balancing; both preemption and First Amendment doctrines can lend themselves to this approach. Another improvement would be to think of the First Amendment as an intellectual property regime of its own, one with general preemptive power.
Recommended Citation
Rebecca Tushnet,
Raising Walls Against Overlapping Rights: Preemption and the Right of Publicity,
92
Notre Dame L. Rev.
1539
(2017).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol92/iss4/5