Abstract
This Review proceeds in three Parts. Part I briefly summarizes Common Good Constitutionalism and provides a more detailed description of four of the book’s distinctive features. Part II critiques Vermeule’s argument in light of the classical tradition’s four essential aspects of law, namely that it is an ordinance of reason, for the common good, made by one who has care of the community, and promulgated. Part III draws on those reflections to respond to Vermeule’s criticisms of work like ours that argues that original-law-based understandings of the Constitution are at home in the classical legal tradition. A Conclusion briefly reflects on the choices facing the classical natural lawyer in the American constitutional order going forward.
Recommended Citation
Jeffrey A. Pojanowski & Kevin C. Walsh,
Recovering Classical Legal Constitutionalism: A Critique of Professor Vermeule's New Theory,
98
Notre Dame L. Rev.
403
(2022).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol98/iss1/7