Abstract
This Note argues that state constitutions should have more difficult amendment procedures than most states currently do. Part I highlights the ease of amending most state constitutions by evaluating state constitutional amendment procedures. Next, Part II argues that because constitutions are fundamental, organizing laws, their amendment procedures should reflect such status. Finally, Part III of this Note examines state constitutional amendments that resulted from national political turmoil and argues amendment procedures should be stringent enough to temper such reactionism. If a constitution is to be a constitution, it must be resilient enough to function as one. State constitutions largely fail to be so.
Recommended Citation
Jared C. Huber,
Strengthening State Constitutions,
99
Notre Dame L. Rev.
1621
(2024).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol99/iss4/8