Abstract
This Note will first succinctly review the history of aggregative litigation, including the decline of traditional Rule 23 class actions, the proliferation of arbitration agreements, and both the legislative and judicial support for this change. Next, it will examine plaintiffs’ response to the rise of arbitration with the creation of mass arbitration networks and explain why some companies started to move away from arbitration. Then it will consider the defense bar’s response to mass arbitration with batch and bellwether proceedings, examine the current bellwether arbitration cases moving through the courts, and introduce the latest arbitral institution making headways with its rules and procedures: New Era ADR. Finally, it will identify the additional needs of batch and bellwether arbitration, advance the elastic bellwether model, and demonstrate the theory’s ability to remedy the current issues plaguing mass arbitrations.
Recommended Citation
Bennett Rogers,
Elastic Batch and Bellwether Proceedings in Mass Arbitration,
99
Notre Dame L. Rev.
1655
(2024).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol99/iss4/9