Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1944

Publication Information

19 Notre Dame Law. 255 (1943-1944).

Abstract

The Indiana legislature has in substance adopted the Uniform Conditional Sales Law. Where the conditional seller of goods subsequently affixed to a freehold fails to record his contract, he has virtually no rights whatsoever as against subsequent purchasers and mortgagees. It is inescapable that the conditional seller's reservation of title under an unrecorded contract would be invalid as against, a subsequent mortgagee, and that he in no way could replevy the furnace, even though its removal would occasion little or no injury to the freehold. I have attempted to show it is a minority rule differing and distinct from the Restatement, clear in the cases-but criticized.

Comments

Reprinted with permission of Notre Dame Law Review (previously Notre Dame Lawyer).

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.