Document Type


Publication Date


Publication Information

14 Clinical L. Rev. 337 (2007-2008)


This essay examines the question of lawyer-client counseling on the issue of raising "technical" defenses, such as statutes of limitations. The authors challenge the prevailing notion of American lawyers that technical defenses raise no moral issue worthy of dialogue between lawyers and clients. Looking at the history of legal ethics and modern treatment in European law, they suggest that questions of limitations do raise moral issues. They go on to explore how those moral issues ought to be discussed and decided between lawyers and clients, using the framework of lawyers as godfathers, hired guns, gurus, and friends that they laid out in their book, Lawyers, Clients, and Moral Responsibility. They conclude that although the moral questions are not different, the poverty law context suggests a need for sensitivity to the power imbalance between the lawyer and client and the level of intensity of moral persuasion.


Reprinted with permission of the Clinical Law Review.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.