Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1964
Publication Information
39 Notre Dame L. 214 (1963-1964)
Abstract
Examining Killough v. United States, 315 F. 2d 241 (D.C. Cir. 1962) which held that the oral reaffirmation of a day-old confession obtained from the defendant without representation by counsel was inadmissible in a federal trial. Professor Dutile notes that this case marked a "further extension" of the exclusionary principle.
Recommended Citation
Fernand N. Dutile,
Recent Decisions (Criminal Law-Confessions-Reaffirmation of Inadmissible Confession Also Held Inadmissible),
39 Notre Dame L. 214 (1963-1964).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/911
Comments
Reprinted with permission of Notre Dame Law Review (Notre Dame Lawyer).