"Brief of Richard W. Garnett, Michael Stokes Paulsen, & Eugene Volokh a" by Kevin C. Walsh, Ryan A. Shores et al.
 

Document Type

Brief

Case Name

Eleanor McCullen v. Martha Coakley

Publication Date

4-24-2013

Abstract

No. 12-1168
Eleanor McCullen v. Martha Coakley

On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

From the Summary of Argument

This Court granted certiorari in Hill v. Colorado “[b]ecause of the importance of the case.” 530 U.S. 703, 714 (2000). The Court should grant certiorari in this case because of the importance of placing limits on Hill.

The Court does not need to overrule Hill to contain the damage wrought by the First Circuit’s expansion of it. But the Court should contain Hill and thereby prevent further erosion of First Amendment protections for public-forum speech. The challenged Act prohibits stationary handbilling and conversational speech within fixed exclusion zones on public sidewalks near abortion clinics. The Act is not narrowly tailored to governmental interests in protecting unwilling listeners from close physical approaches or in preserving access to abortion clinics.

Comments

Amici are constitutional law professors who teach and write in the area of First Amendment law. Although amici have divergent perspectives on the Court’s abortion jurisprudence, amici agree on the importance of the First Amendment principles at stake in this case.

Richard W. Garnett is Associate Dean and Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame Law School. The courses he teaches include Constitutional Law and Freedom of Speech/First Amendment. His publications include THE FIRST AMENDMENT: A READER (3d ed.) (ed., with John H. Garvey & Frederick Schauer) (forthcoming 2014), and FIRST AMENDMENT STORIES (ed., with Andrew Koppelman) (Foundation Press 2011).

Share

COinS