Document Type
Brief
Publication Date
5-27-2016
Abstract
The District Court correctly determined that the challenged speech of Dr. Steven Novella was not commercial speech for purposes of applying the Lanham Act. Appellant’s argument to the contrary conflates “seeking profit” with “commercial speech.”
Recommended Citation
Brief of Amici Curiae Intellectual Property Law Professors, Tobinick v. Novella, No. 15-14889 (11th Cir. May 27, 2016)
COinS
Comments
Joined: Stacey Dogan, Boston University School of Law
Eric Goldman, Santa Clara Law
Michael Grynberg, DePaul University College of Law
Mark Lemley, Stanford Law School
Yvette Joy Liebesman, Saint Louis University School of Law
Mark McKenna, Notre Dame Law School
Jessica Silbey, Northeastern University School of Law
Rebecca Tushnet, Georgetown Law