From a Muddle to a Mudslide: Murr v. Wisconsin

Authors

Nicole Stelle Garnett, Notre Dame Law SchoolFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2017

Publication Information

Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 131 (2017)

Abstract

This article analyzes the U.S. Supreme Court's most-recent regulatory takings decision, Murr v. Wisconsin, concluding that the decision further muddies the takings waters and threatens to undermine the already-limited protection of private property provided by the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause.

Recommended Citation

Nicole S. Garnett, From a Muddle to a Mudslide: Murr v. Wisconsin, Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 131 (2017).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1316