Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2017
Publication Information
Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 131 (2017)
Abstract
This article analyzes the U.S. Supreme Court's most-recent regulatory takings decision, Murr v. Wisconsin, concluding that the decision further muddies the takings waters and threatens to undermine the already-limited protection of private property provided by the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause.
Recommended Citation
Nicole S. Garnett,
From a Muddle to a Mudslide: Murr v. Wisconsin,
Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 131 (2017).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1316
