New York Times Co v Sullivan: the 'Actual Malice' – standard and editorial decision-making

Authors

Geoffrey Bennett, Notre Dame Law School
Russel L. Weaver

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1993

Publication Information

14 Tolley's J. Media L. & Prac. 2 (1993)

Abstract

In an effort to explore conflicting views of the New York Times decision, this article compares how the British media functions under Britain's more restrictive defamation laws with how the US media functions under the actual malice standard. It does so based on interviews with reporters, editors, defamation lawyers, and others involved in the media in an effort to understand how they decide which stories to publish, and to gain some understanding of how libel laws affect editorial decision-making.

Recommended Citation

Geoffrey Bennett & Russel L. Weaver, New York Times Co v Sullivan: the 'Actual Malice' – standard and editorial decision-making, 14 Tolley's J. Media L. & Prac. 2 (1993).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1498