Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2024

Publication Information

55 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 357 (2024).

Abstract

This article explores the concept of educational adequacy, balancing the right to education for children and educational freedoms. Specifically, the research paper describes why States parties must meet Article 13(1) goals under the International Covenant of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) but, at the same time, ensure parents’ rights and the liberty to establish and direct private educational institutions as minimum core and immediate-effect obligations. Accordingly, there is no prioritization or subordination of educational freedoms favoring the right to education, or vice versa, which constitutes a false dichotomy since the right to education and educational liberties are interrelated rights that must be balanced at the level of domestic implementation. The latter is clear because education is not a morally neutral process, which is why legal pluralism in the educational context is not only an application or interpretation of subsidiarity as a general principle of international human rights law, as educational diversity also appears as a direct and explicit application of Articles 13(3) and 13(4) of the ICESCR.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.