Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1992

Publication Information

61 Fordhman L. Rev. 105 (1992).

Abstract

In this article on constitutional development and the New Deal Court, Professor Cushman argues that the conventional story of the Court's radical reversing of its jurisprudence in the face of the Court-packing plan is misconceived. The article instead seeks to demonstrate that Jones & Laughlin, one of the cases comprising the Constitutional Revolution of 1937, was conceptually, stylistically, and doctrinally congruent with the Court's contemporary jurisprudence. The paradigm shift in commerce clause jurisprudence. Professor Cushman contends, came not in 1937, but in 1941 and 1942, after Roosevelt had had an opportunity to refashion the Court with a new generation of legal thinkers.

Included in

Jurisprudence Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.