Document Type
Response or Comment
Publication Date
1985
Publication Information
94 Yale L.J. 1661 (1985)
Abstract
The Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) movement has garnished much debate with scholars arguing on both sides—for or against—its further implementation into our adversarial system. This Article critiques the arguments against the movement focusing on Professor Owen Fiss’ work. From a theological reconciliation point of view, the Authors argue in favor of its further implementation because the ADR system promotes justice, community values, and the reconciliation of problems rather than resolution.
Recommended Citation
Andrew W. McThenia & Thomas L. Shaffer,
For Reconciliation,
94 Yale L.J. 1661 (1985).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/179
Comments
Reprinted with permission of Yale Law Journal.