Response or Comment
94 Yale L.J. 1661 (1985)
The Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) movement has garnished much debate with scholars arguing on both sides—for or against—its further implementation into our adversarial system. This Article critiques the arguments against the movement focusing on Professor Owen Fiss’ work. From a theological reconciliation point of view, the Authors argue in favor of its further implementation because the ADR system promotes justice, community values, and the reconciliation of problems rather than resolution.
Andrew W. McThenia & Thomas L. Shaffer,
94 Yale L.J. 1661 (1985).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/179