Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2021
Publication Information
Harv. J.L & Pub. Pol'y Per Curiam [1] (2021).
Abstract
This essay, based on an amicus curiae brief filed in the Dobbs case, explains that the Roe and Casey decisions were "grievously wrong", that no traditional stare decisis considerations weigh in favor of retaining them, and that they should be overruled.
Recommended Citation
Charles J. Cooper, Richard W. Garnett, Peter A. Patterson, Brian W. Barnes & John D. Ohlendorf,
Roe and Casey Were Grievously Wrong and Should Be Overruled,
Harv. J.L & Pub. Pol'y Per Curiam [1] (2021)..
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1903
COinS
Comments
This Article is adapted from the Brief of Amicus Curiae Ethics and Public Policy Center in Support of Petitioners and Reversal filed in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392.
Click here to read the brief.