Document Type

Foreword

Publication Date

1987

Publication Information

62 Notre Dame L. Rev. 501 (1987).

Abstract

Professor Zeidler's article appears in the sixty-second volume of the Notre Dame Law Review, in English, for the first time. It is the most comprehensive and up-to-date treatment of the Federal Constitutional Court's decisional procedures to appear so far in an American law review. It should interest students of comparative constitutional law as well as American scholars alarmed by the United States Supreme Court's claims to finality or exclusivity in constitutional interpretation. By the use of certain decisional modes described by President Zeidler, the German Court provides the legislature with considerable leeway in meeting its constitutional obligations. In doing so the Court does not close off the search for a better ordering of constitutional values by democratic means. It does not foreclose further debate or action with respect to a matter of doubtful constitutionality. It fosters instead a creative constitutional dialogue between itself and parliament.

Comments

Reprinted with permission of the Notre Dame Law Review.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.