Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1963

Publication Information

39 Indiana Law Journal 69 (1963)

Abstract

Given the possibility that Indiana may be critically short of water before this century ends, the inquiring purpose of this paper is whether the courts of that state are looking less at the future need for water than at the past abundance of it.

Surface water in Indiana has always been regarded as a nuisance, even in the unusually dry growing season of 1963. "A river," Justice Holmes once said, "is more than an amenity. It offers a necessity of life that must be rationed among those who have power over it." In a state that faces a dearth of water in its future and remembers with too little concern the abundant water of its past, this should be true of rivers under the ground and rivers without banks, as much as it has become true of the Wabash, the St. Joseph, and the Ohio. Thus the first part of this paper has been devoted to summarizing the scientific classifications of surface water and the climatic factors which produce it; the next to tracing the development of rules of law on using, disposing of, and guarding against surface water flow, and the last part to outlining the more prominent facts involved in meeting future water demands in Indiana and evaluating whether the present rules of law accommodate the governmental and private efforts required to meet the demands.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.