Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2000
Publication Information
17 Const. Comment. 219 (2000)
Abstract
The article discusses what types of legal cases constitute a “canon” on American constitutional theory and comparative constitutional law, examples of case law that illustrate important developments in the two subjects. It describes the process taken by the article's authors to select a small sampling of 90 “canon” cases for their course book on American constitutional law, which is designed for the academic community and for undergraduate students enrolled in a traditional liberal arts curriculum.
Recommended Citation
Donald P. Kommers & John E. Finn,
A Comparative Constitutional Law Canon,
17 Const. Comment. 219 (2000).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/90
Comments
Reprinted with permission of Constitutional Commentary.